Nigeria's President-Elect, Muhammadu Buhari |
The second coming of
General Muhammadu Buhari as Nigeria’s president holds a lot of significance for
the Katsina-born general on one hand and the Nigerian nation on the other.
For Buhari, it is another
golden opportunity to re-enact and possibly surpass the feat he achieved in
office 30 years ago. He will also use this opportunity to deeply reflect on
what actually caused his ouster despite his laudable vision for the country, with
a view to avoid making similar mistakes.
For the nation, it is a
time to decide whether to endure Buhari’s ‘bitters’ for its pile-ridden system
to be effectively cleansed or take another sweetener to further strengthen the
pile to continue to wreak havoc in the system.
Many observers have indeed
come up with reasons why Buhari’s first stint at the helm of affairs of Nigeria
did not last beyond two years. The reasons range from his style of leadership,
to his political naivety. They also stemmed from his principled and
uncompromising stance on issues.
But beyond the adduced
reasons above, there is another school of thought that offers a possible factor
that brought down Buhari, then. The factor is psychological and has proven to
be highly effective in striking or pulling down good leaders. Consider this
lines:
“The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy.”
The above is a quotation from
item eleven of Protocol One, of the Twenty Four Protocols of the Learned Elders
of Zion; often referred to as the Jewish Conspiracy in many quarters.
The Protocol provides the
substance of addresses delivered to the innermost circle of the Rulers of Zion.
It entails minutes of the proceedings of the meetings of the Learned Elders of
Zion on how they planned to rule the world through cunning and crooked means.
It also reveals the clandestine plan of action of the Jewish nation developed through
the ages to dominate the world. Despite its conformity with the way they have
conducted themselves over the ages, the Jews has denied the authorship of the
document.
One thing that has
continued to amaze observers and indeed keen watchers of events as they unfold in
the world since the ‘leakage’ of the document is the fact that its content fits
perfectly into what, when, where, why and how those events happen. Mr. Henry
Ford, an American industrialist and founder of Ford Motoring Company, in an interview
published in the New York WORLD of February 17th, 1921, puts it succinctly
thus:
Late Henry Ford |
"The only statement I
care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on.
They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this
time. THEY FIT IT NOW." Mr Ford was
widely known for his pacificism during the first years of the World War I and
also for being the publisher of the book ‘The International Jew.’
Back to the above quote.
Truly or coincidentally, it seems morality and politics have no relationship,
at least going by historical experiences in recent past. Great ‘moro-national’
qualities like frankness and honesty have indeed become vices in politics, and
they have inadvertently brought ‘down rulers from their thrones more effectively
and more certainly than the most powerful enemy.’
The current crisis in Egypt
is a perfect example of how these great qualities practically brought down a
democratically-elected president and installed the most cruel and despicable
human being to power.
President Morsi of Egypt |
President Mohammad Morsi is
loved and trusted by most Egyptians. They believe having him as their leader
would put the country back on the track of growth, development and indeed
greatness. But barely a year in power, the hapless president got the butt from
the ‘powers-that- be’ from within and outside Egypt for no offence other than
committing the twin ‘vices’ of frankness and honesty in dealing with his people
and the rest of the world. He’s just been handed a 20 year prison term on phony
charges of inciting violence that led to the death of some protesters who are
mainly his supporters in 2013!
Former Egypt dictator, Hosni Mubarak |
Interestingly, his
immediate predecessor, Hosni Mubarak, who resorted to ‘both cunning and
make-believe,’ tactics, ruled the country for three decades. The dictator, who
was charged with corruption and death of protesters during the revolution that
ousted him from power has been freed of all the charges, and now walking as a
free man.
While his reign lasted,
Mubarak oppressed, suppressed and terrorised the people of Egypt. He
institutionalised corruption in all facets of the Cradle of Civilisation and
ensured the empowerment of a few cabal in all sectors. The world powers, led by
the United States gave him all the needed support. He got billions of dollars
in aid and weapons to remain in power for that long, until the mass revolution
of January 25, 2011 swept him away.
Morsi on the other hand was
not only starved of support from the world powers and strangely, the gulf
monarchs, his ouster was strategically engineered, massively funded and
dastardly executed by them. When Morsi assumed the leadership of Egypt, US
President, Barrack Obama, without mincing words, told him that ‘Egypt is
neither an enemy nor a friend of the US.’ This statement heralded the series of
events that culminated in the final toppling of his government in June 2013.
History is replete with
instances of upright leaders who were swept off power due to their ‘frankness
and honesty.’ At the same time, history has also recorded presidents, prime
ministers and other state leaders who held on to power for quite a very long
time, subjugating and enslaving their people through ‘cunning and
make-beliefs.’ They can still be seen around today.
The story of Nigeria’s
newly-elected president, General Muhammadu Buhari, during his first coming as a
military head of state, buttressed the proposition or simply put, the thinking
of the Jews that morality brings down good government easily more than the
enemy.
General Buhari ran a disciplined, transparent and honest government that is unparalleled in the history of Nigeria. He was highly-principled, incorruptible, patriotic and disciplined. Within one year of his leadership, the mess that the country had become under the Shehu Shagari administration was radically corrected. It was difficult for drug barons to make Nigeria a transit point for their trade. Nigerians were made to imbibe the culture of discipline, orderliness and courteousness in their public dealings. The culture of environmental sanitation that the nation still practices till now became entrenched during that administration and corruption was reduced to a barest minimum.
However, the ‘Jewish
thinking’ came to pass and in 1985 when Buhari was kicked out of office by the
gap-toothed General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida. Because of his smiles,
Babangida was believed to be humane, and capable of taking Nigeria to the
Promised Land.
General Ibrahim Babangida |
Buhari on the other hand was perceived as rigid, strict and too
‘inhuman’ for many.
Nigerians impatiently
sacrificed Buhari’s ‘principledness’ on the altar of selfish aggrandisement and
corruptive culture of Babangida. His glorious regime lasted only two years
while that of the all-smiling maradonic IBB dragged on for eight painful years.
Late General Murtala Muhammed |
Before Buhari’s ascension
to power in 1983, another brilliant leader, General Murtala Ramat Muhammed had
suffered the similar fate and paid with his life barely six months in office!
He had a brilliant vision for Nigeria but that vision was never allowed to
blossom by the world powers who connived with vicious elements within the
country to truncate it.
Now that the Katsina-born
General has been given another uncommon mandate to lead the country, the
question is: should he bow to the notion of mischief governance just to retain
power or maintain his uprightness and honesty in his quest to execute his noble
plans for Nigeria?
From the moralist
perspective, Buhari has no option than to maintain his principled stance, which
in the first place endeared him to most Nigerians that voted for him. But from
the realist view, the president-elect must find a balance between morality and
smartness (cunningness) if he must succeed. He must, as a true army general
that he is, go back to the cheese board and play the game with all tactics, deftness
and needed strategy. To this school of thought, too much ‘moralness,’ without
necessary caution may make him suffer the same fate as he did in 1985.
It may not be entirely
correct to attribute the fall of the aforementioned leaders to their uprightness
after all. After all, the Lee Kwan Yews of this world survived without
employing the Machiavellian theories or resorting to maradonic tendencies. It’s
just because those who design and control the world affairs from the shadows
have devised it in such a way that only the corrupt and the cunning, which will
be of great advantage to their grand ‘evil plan’ for the world, endure in
leadership positions.
As a principled man with
the fear of God, righteousness, uprightness and truthfulness must not be made
to be submissive to wickedness, lies and crookedness. Hence, General Buhari
should hold on to his principles and still hope to survive. After all, the
outgoing government lost power as a result of loads of lies and excessive penchant
for corruption. Our president subscribed to the counsel of the Jews and
resorted to mischief, cunningness and make-beliefs in the affairs of
governance. Many even linked his belief in these notions to his frequent visits
to the Jewish nation while in power. But the more he resorted to these ‘skills’
the more he gets into trouble and earned the ire of Nigerians; leading to the
technical liquidation of his government on March 28, 2015.
So, General Buhari should
not sacrifice his principles. The name ‘Buhari’ alone in today’s Nigeria scares
corruption and send fears down the spines of corrupt individuals. He must
therefore build on this goodwill to deliver the dividends of democracy to
Nigerians and take the nation to the greater height. Great national qualities
of frankness and honesty are only vices to the evil-minded and the reactionaries.
They are veritable tools in the hands of progressives.
Truth shall forever prevail
over falsehood.